Invented numbers
"8/10 trials correct" written by a model that never saw the data sheet.
Human-in-the-loop by design
Generic AI writes fluent text — and fills gaps with details that never happened. AbaAiCheck's Assertive Bracket System does the opposite: when a fact is missing, the draft shows [specify: prompt level] instead of a guess, and the RBT or BCBA completes it before signing.
A session note is a legal record that supports a claim. If an AI tool adds a prompt level, a trial count or a reinforcer the clinician never documented, and the note is signed, the record no longer reflects the service that was delivered. In an audit, documentation that does not support the billed service can lead to recoupment (clawbacks) — and invented details can look like falsified documentation.
"8/10 trials correct" written by a model that never saw the data sheet.
A "gestural prompt" the RBT never recorded, because it "sounds right".
A calm "the client transitioned independently" that contradicts what happened.
The engine drafts the note in ABC format using only the facts the note documents. It is instructed never to invent a missing variable: instead it inserts a standardized bracket where the fact belongs. The draft cannot be re-checked while brackets remain, and the verified score comes from auditing the completed note.
The note is checked against the CPT code billed; missing elements become findings.
Missing data appears as [specify: duration], [specify: prompt level], [specify: reinforcer delivered].
Only the person who delivered the session fills the brackets with real facts.
A real audit of the completed note gives the score you file — never the draft's estimate.
Draft from an RBT note (demo — nothing is sent anywhere)
Antecedent: the tablet was removed at the end of the break. Behavior: the client cried and dropped to the floor for . Consequence: the RBT delivered a prompt to the manding task and the client resumed; was delivered after independent mands.
It is a design rule, not a promise that AI can never be wrong: the model is instructed never to state a fact the note does not contain, the Date of Service is protected by a code-level check, and nothing is final until a human completes the brackets and re-checks the note. That combination is what keeps an ABA session note audit defensible.
Install the extension, sign in, and run a review from Chrome's side panel — or start in the web app with a 5-note free trial.
AbaAiCheck supports clinical documentation review. It does not replace clinical judgment, legal advice or payer-specific guidance, and it does not guarantee payer approval: the clinician reviews every suggestion and remains responsible for each note they sign.